[ 5 posts ]

 Print view Previous topic | Next topic

#### Guide 4 - Probability - Chapter 12 - Page 191

Author Message
 Post subject: Guide 4 - Probability - Chapter 12 - Page 191  Posted: Sun May 23, 2010 11:40 pm
 Course Students

Posts: 3
 A gambler rolls three fair 6 sided dice. What is the probability that 2 of the dice show the same number but the third shows a different number?I don't see the flaw in my reasoning:Lets say the gambler played the dice the first time: 1/6 is the probability for any number to come up, then for the second to match there is 1/6 again and the third not to match, its 5/6. So the probability for the first chain of events becomes 1/6 * 1/6 * 5/6. Now to figure out how many such chains exist: Either the 1st and 3rd are same or 1st and the 2nd are the same or 2nd and the 3rd are the same, which gives us 3 possibilities. This is also confirmed by the distinguishability logic: So if we are looking for all possibilities of arranging the alphabets: S, S and D => its 3! / 2! = 3. So the total probability becomes: 1/6 * 1/6 * 5/6 * 3. But the answer is 15/36.I don't understand the flaw in this reasoning. Please help! Thanks...

 Post subject: Re: Guide 4 - Probability - Chapter 12 - Page 191  Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 6:40 am
 Forum Guests

Posts: 1
 I thought of this problem this way.We roll the first two dice and end up with 1,1The third die ends up anything other than 1 [2:6]5 possible outcomes1,1,21,1,31,1,41,1,51,1,6You have 5 outcomes for each duplicate digit start:2,2, x where x not = to 2 [5 solutions]So we have 30 outcomes. With matching 1st and 2nd die.Then as you mentioned order is not important so we have 2 additional sets of 30 outcomesSo we have 90 outcomes that satisfy x,x,y where y not = xTotal outcomes 6 x 6 x 690:216reduces to 15:36As far as your reasoning I think you start off with the wrong footThe first die really doesn't matter, it is the second die that must match the first. Using your method you should start6/6 x 1/6 x 5/6In words it does not matter if I get a 1 or a 6 on the first die, it is the second die that must match what I receive on the first die.

 Post subject: Re: Guide 4 - Probability - Chapter 12 - Page 191  Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:09 pm
 ManhattanGMAT Staff

Posts: 5202
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 Perfect explanation! Yes, the original poster neglected to use the fact that the first die roll can be anything, and then the constraints are applied only to the second and third dice.. _________________Tim SandersManhattan GMAT InstructorFollow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html

 Post subject: Re: Guide 4 - Probability - Chapter 12 - Page 191  Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:58 am
 Forum Guests

Posts: 27
 Q1.While calculating the probability, why are we EXCLUDING the first dice in each of the three possibilities?Q2 Why are we not considering the first dice in the final answer?Q3. I went through the alternate explanation on the coloured dice, which shows the calculation as 1x 1/6x 5/6 for Dice1, Dice2 and Dice 3 respectively. Are we designating "1" to "Dice 1" because the outcome of "Dice 1" could be ANY number (6/6=1), and hence the probability of "Dice 2" and "Dice 3" is based on "Dice 1" probability. And if that is the case, is that why "1" has not been mentioned in the original explanation, because 1X either of the three possibilities = either of the possibilities.I.e. Possibility 1= 1X1/6X5/6= 5/36 Possibility 2= 1X5/6X1/6= 5/36 Possibility 3= 1X5/6X1/6 = 5/36Which is 3x5/36 = 15/36Thanks

 Post subject: Re: Guide 4 - Probability - Chapter 12 - Page 191  Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 1:50 pm
 ManhattanGMAT Staff

Posts: 5202
Location: Southwest Airlines, seat 21C
 All three of your questions appear to be the same question. The reason we exclude the first die is that anything works. In other words, the first die is acceptable with 100% probability. If you donâ€™t feel comfortable ignoring the first die entirely, you can factor it into your calculations by multiplying the 100% by what you get for the other dice. So in other words the discussion you bring up in question 3 is perfectly valid.. _________________Tim SandersManhattan GMAT InstructorFollow this link for some important tips to get the most out of your forum experience:https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/a-few-tips-t31405.html

Display posts from previous:  Sort by

[ 5 posts ]

#### Who is online

 Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ Ask An Instructor    General GMAT Strategy Questions    GMAT Math       General Math Questions       GMAT Prep Math       Manhattan GMAT CAT Math       Manhattan GMAT Non-CAT Math       Official Guide Math    GMAT Verbal       General Verbal Questions       GMAT Prep Verbal       Manhattan GMAT CAT Verbal       Manhattan GMAT Non-CAT Verbal       Official Guide Verbal    GMAT Integrated Reasoning (IR)       GMAT Prep IR       Manhattan GMAT CAT IR       Manhattan GMAT Non-CAT IR    GMAT AWA Essays Manhattan GMAT    Ask Student Services    Study Groups    GMAT Test Day    Test Centers    Instructor Feedback    Course Feedback B-School    Ask an mbaMission Admissions Consultant    B-School Essays    Business Schools    Professional Networking