{"id":12924,"date":"2017-02-07T20:47:35","date_gmt":"2017-02-07T20:47:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/?p=12924"},"modified":"2019-09-05T15:54:46","modified_gmt":"2019-09-05T15:54:46","slug":"gmat-sentence-correction-spot-the-trap-part-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/blog\/gmat-sentence-correction-spot-the-trap-part-1\/","title":{"rendered":"GMAT Sentence Correction: Spot the Trap! (Part 1)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-13155\" src=\"\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2017\/01\/2-7-17-blog-1.png\" alt=\"Manhattan Prep GMAT Blog - GMAT Sentence Correction: Spot the Trap! (Part 1) by Stacey Koprince\" width=\"676\" height=\"264\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2017\/01\/2-7-17-blog-1.png 676w, https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2017\/01\/2-7-17-blog-1-300x117.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Did you know that you can attend the first session of any of our online or in-person GMAT courses absolutely free? We\u2019re not kidding! <a href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/classes\/?utm_source=manhattanprep.com%2Fgmat%2Fblog&#038;utm_medium=blog&#038;utm_content=GMAT%20Complete%20Courses%20Plug&#038;utm_campaign=GMAT%20Blog\" target=\"_blank\">Check out our upcoming courses here<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>If you\u2019re a non-native English speaker, you know that you\u2019ll need to be extra careful with idioms and other constructions that native speakers just \u201cknow.\u201d If you\u2019re a native speaker, though, don\u2019t think that you have a huge advantage! The GMAT test writers know the kinds of common errors that have crept into spoken language, and they\u2019re going to try to trap you, too!<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Note:<\/strong> if you\u2019re interested, take a look at our <\/span><a href=\"\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/blog\/2013\/09\/23\/how-to-solve-any-sentence-correction-problem-part-1\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">recommended Sentence Correction Process<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> before you try the SC problem below.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">All right, are you ready? This SC problem is from the free GMATPrep\u00ae practice problem set. When you\u2019re done, we\u2019ll talk about how to spot the GMAT traps and get these questions right!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">* \u201cIf the proposed expenditures for gathering information abroad are reduced even further, international news reports <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">have been and will continue to diminish<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in number and quality.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201c(A) have been and will continue to diminish<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201c(B) have and will continue to diminish<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201c(C) will continue to diminish, as they already did,<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201c(D) will continue to diminish, as they have already,<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201c(E) will continue to diminish\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The First Glance showed a significant difference: <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">have<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> vs. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Something\u2019s going on with verb tense here\u2014and that means something is going on with meaning in general, since verb tense is really all about conveying the proper meaning. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> do these actions take place?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Next, I read the original sentence and it sounded okay to me. So I dove into the grammar a little more carefully. The underlined portion contains an <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and I know what that means: parallelism. So what needs to be parallel here?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201creports <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">have been<\/span><\/i> <b>and<\/b> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will continue<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to diminish\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So far, so good. We\u2019ve got two verbs. It\u2019s fine to make two verbs of different tenses parallel.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There is one problem, though. The parallel portions each have to create their own independent sentence. Consider these examples:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(1) Stan is studying and will call you back later. (Correct)<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(2) Stan was and is studying. (Correct\u2014though kind of clunky)<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(3) Stan has been and will study. (Incorrect)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What\u2019s wrong with that third one?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(1) Stan is studying. Stan will call you back later.<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(2) Stan was studying. Stan is studying.<br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(3) Stan has been study. (???) Stan will study.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whoops. When I try to split the two parallel parts into separate sentences, my third example doesn\u2019t work. I can\u2019t say \u201cStan has been study.\u201d It should be \u201cStan has been studying.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Go back to answer (A) of the problem we did.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201creports <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">have been<\/span><\/i> <b>and<\/b> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will continue<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to diminish\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reports have been\u2026diminish? Reports have been to diminish? No. It should really say <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">reports have been diminishing<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, but the word <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">diminishing<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> is not in the sentence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So the parallelism fails in the original sentence; eliminate choice (A). <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Answer (B) has a similar problem. It should say <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">have diminished<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> or <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">have continued to diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. It\u2019s not correct to say <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">have diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> or <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">have continue to diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The other three choices all begin with <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, completely knocking out the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">have<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> part. But\u2026interesting. Choices (C) and (D) both add another tense afterward, but choice (E) does not. It just says <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will continue to diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Stop for a second. What\u2019s the difference in meaning between saying something <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">has diminished<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and something <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">? Timeframe, of course. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Has diminished<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> has already started and it\u2019s still true or still going on in the present. <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Will diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> will take place in the future.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But wait\u2014what\u2019s the difference in meaning between <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will continue to diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">? <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Will diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> is pure future, but <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will continue to diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> means that this thing already started to diminish and it\u2019s going to continue to diminish in the future. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In other words: <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will continue to diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> encompasses the full meaning of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">has diminished <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">and <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will diminish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">! It already started and it will keep going.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It\u2019s redundant to say both; you only need to say <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will continue to<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Cross off answers (A), (B), (C), and (D) for redundant meaning!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><strong>The correct answer is (E).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Question for you: Did you cross off (E)\u2014or consider crossing it off\u2014because you felt that it was missing something? How come it just dropped that other tense, the one that all of the other choices had?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If so, here\u2019s where you need to retrain your ear. First, just because something was in the original sentence does not mean that the correct answer has to retain that thing. (This is especially true when that thing is redundant or illogical or ambiguous\u2014there\u2019s actually something not-good about it. But it <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">could<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> be the case that the correct answer does drop some perfectly fine meaning from the original sentence. This doesn\u2019t happen often, but it does happen. If the other four answers are all wrong, then this one is the right one, even if the meaning has changed a bit.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So first, instead of immediately being suspicious of (E) just because it changes something, take a step back and ask yourself: what\u2019s the actual <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">meaning<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that\u2019s going on in this sentence? Specifically: Is there anything redundant or illogical or ambiguous about any of these constructions? What does it mean to drop the other verb and only use <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will continue<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In this case, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">will continue<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> by definition means \u201cstarted in the past and continuing into the future,\u201d so there\u2019s no need to repeat part of that meaning with another verb somewhere else. If you spot that trap, you can cross off all four wrong answers!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Want more? Keep an eye out for the second part of this series!<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><b>Key Takeaways for Redundancy in Sentence Correction<\/b><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(1) Sometimes, you need to back away from the screen a little bit and think about the overall meaning of a sentence or part of a sentence. Don\u2019t be so focused on micro-portions that you lose sight of the big picture.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(2) Don\u2019t cross something off just because it changes (or appears to change) the meaning from whatever the original sentence said. Instead, look specifically for three things: redundant meaning, illogical meaning, or ambiguous meaning. (That last one is the hardest, by the way\u2014that\u2019s why I put it last.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(3) As you get better with the above, it\u2019s really important to be able to find the core sentence. Want more practice with that skill? <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/blog\/2015\/01\/02\/gmat-sentence-correction-find-core-sentence-part-1\/\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Check out this series<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.\u00a0?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">* GMATPrep\u00ae questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/blog\/2017\/02\/21\/gmat-sentence-correction-spot-the-trap-part-2\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Move on to Part 2 of &#8220;Spot the Trap!&#8221; here.<\/strong><\/a><\/h4>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em><strong>Can\u2019t get enough of Stacey\u2019s GMAT mastery? Attend the first session of one of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/classes\/?utm_source=manhattanprep.com%2Fgmat%2Fblog&#038;utm_medium=blog&#038;utm_content=KoprinceCoursesLinkGMATBlog&#038;utm_campaign=GMAT%20Blog#instructor\/86\" target=\"_blank\">her upcoming GMAT courses<\/a> absolutely free, no strings attached. Seriously.\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/instructors\/stacey-koprince\/?utm_source=manhattanprep.com%2Fgmat%2Fblog&#038;utm_medium=blog&#038;utm_content=KoprinceBioLinkGMATBlog&#038;utm_campaign=GMAT%20Blog\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-9719 size-thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn2.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/06\/stacey-koprince-150x150.png\" alt=\"stacey-koprince\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a><em><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/instructors\/stacey-koprince\/?utm_source=manhattanprep.com%2Fgmat%2Fblog&#038;utm_medium=blog&#038;utm_content=KoprinceBioLinkGMATBlog&#038;utm_campaign=GMAT%20Blog\" target=\"_blank\">Stacey Koprince<\/a> is a Manhattan Prep instructor based in Montreal, Canada and Los Angeles, California.<\/strong> Stacey has been teaching the GMAT, GRE, and LSAT \u00a0for more than 15 years and is one of the most well-known instructors in the industry. Stacey loves to teach and is absolutely fascinated by standardized tests. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/classes\/?utm_source=manhattanprep.com%2Fgmat%2Fblog&#038;utm_medium=blog&#038;utm_content=KoprinceCoursesLinkGMATBlog&#038;utm_campaign=GMAT%20Blog#instructor\/86\" target=\"_blank\">Check out Stacey\u2019s upcoming GMAT courses here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Did you know that you can attend the first session of any of our online or in-person GMAT courses absolutely free? We\u2019re not kidding! Check out our upcoming courses here. If you\u2019re a non-native English speaker, you know that you\u2019ll need to be extra careful with idioms and other constructions that native speakers just \u201cknow.\u201d [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[873,929,874,52871,930,2,26,10],"tags":[52969,52970],"yst_prominent_words":[53868,54457,54455,54452,54040,53779,54453,53781,53775,54456,54454,54462,54458,54460,53674,53669,54459,53784,53867,54461],"class_list":["post-12924","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-for-current-studiers","category-gmat-prep","category-gmat-resources","category-gmat-strategies","category-gmat-study-guide","category-how-to-study","category-sentence-correction","category-verbal-on-gmat","tag-gmat-sentence-correction-traps","tag-spot-the-trap"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12924","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12924"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12924\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16981,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12924\/revisions\/16981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12924"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12924"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12924"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=12924"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}