{"id":7996,"date":"2014-11-25T10:00:14","date_gmt":"2014-11-25T10:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/?p=7996"},"modified":"2019-09-05T16:00:40","modified_gmt":"2019-09-05T16:00:40","slug":"gmat-data-sufficiency-strategy-test-cases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/blog\/gmat-data-sufficiency-strategy-test-cases\/","title":{"rendered":"GMAT Data Sufficiency Strategy: Test Cases"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"DSIf you\u2019re going to do a great job on Data Sufficiency<\/a>, then you\u2019ve got to know how to Test Cases. This strategy will help you on countless DS problems.<\/p>\n

Try this GMATPrep\u00ae problem from the free exams. Give yourself about 2 minutes. Go!<\/p>\n

* \u201cOn the number line, if the number k<\/em> is to the left of the number t<\/em>, is the product kt<\/em> to the right of t<\/em>?<\/p>\n

\u201c(1) t<\/em> < 0\n\n\u201c(2) k<\/em> < 1\u201d\n\nIf visualizing things helps you wrap your brain around the math (it certainly helps me), sketch out a number line:\n\n\"GMAT_Chart\"<\/p>\n

k<\/em> is somewhere to the left of t<\/em>, but the two actual values could be anything. Both could be positive or both negative, or k<\/em> could be negative and t<\/em> positive. One of the two could even be zero.<\/p>\n

The question asks whether kt<\/em> is to the right of t<\/em>. That is, is the product kt<\/em> greater than t<\/em> by itself?<\/p>\n

There are a million possibilities for the values of k<\/em> and t<\/em>, so this question is what we call a theory question: are there certain characteristics of various numbers that would produce a consistent answer? Common characteristics tested on theory problems include positive, negative, zero, simple fractions, odds, evens, primes\u2014basically, number properties.<\/p>\n

\u201c(1) t<\/em> < 0\n\nThis problem appears to be testing positive and negative, since the statement specifies that one of the values must be negative. Test some real numbers, always making sure that t<\/em> is negative.<\/p>\n

Case #1:<\/p>\n

\"Table_1\"<\/p>\n

Testing Cases involves three consistent steps:<\/p>\n

First, choose numbers to test in the problem<\/p>\n

Second, make sure that you have selected a valid case. All of the givens must be true using your selected numbers.<\/p>\n

Third, answer the question.<\/p>\n

In this case, the answer is Yes. Now, your next strategy comes into play: try to prove the statement insufficient<\/em>.<\/p>\n

How? Ask yourself what numbers you could try that would give you the opposite answer. The first time, you got a Yes. Can you get a No?<\/p>\n

Case #2:<\/p>\n

\"table_2\"<\/p>\n

Careful: this is where you might make a mistake. In trying to find the opposite case, you might try a mix of numbers that is invalid. Always make sure that you have a valid case before you actually try to answer the question. Discard case 2.<\/p>\n

Case #3:<\/p>\n

\"table_3\"<\/p>\n

Hmm. We got another Yes answer. What does this mean? If you can\u2019t come up with the opposite answer, see if you can understand why. According to this statement, t<\/em> is always negative. Since k<\/em> must be smaller than t<\/em>, k<\/em> will also always be negative.<\/p>\n

The product kt<\/em>, then, will be the product of two negative numbers, which is always positive. As a result, kt<\/em> must always be larger than t<\/em>, since kt<\/em> is positive and t <\/em>is negative.<\/p>\n

Okay, statement (1) is sufficient. Cross off answers BCE and check out statement (2):<\/p>\n

\u201c(2) k<\/em> < 1\u201d\n\nYou know the drill. Test cases again!\n\nCase #1:\n\n\"table_4\"<\/p>\n

You\u2019ve got a No answer. Try to find a Yes.<\/p>\n

Case #2:<\/p>\n

\"table_5\"<\/p>\n

Hmm. I got another No. What needs to happen to make kt<\/em> > t<\/em>? Remember what happened when you were testing statement (1): try making them both negative!<\/p>\n

In fact, when you\u2019re testing statement (2), see whether any of the cases you already tested for statement (1) are still valid for statement (2). If so, you can save yourself some work. Ideally, the below would be your path for statement (2), not what I first showed above:<\/p>\n

\u201c(2) k<\/em> < 1\u201d\n\nCase #1:\n\n\"table_7\"<\/p>\n

Now, try to find your opposite answer: can you get a No?All you have to do is make sure that the case is valid. If so, you\u2019ve already done the math, so you know that the answer is the same (in this case, Yes).<\/p>\n

Case #2: Try something I couldn\u2019t try before. k<\/em> could be positive or even 0\u2026<\/p>\n

\"table_8\"<\/p>\n

A Yes and a No add up to an insufficient answer. Eliminate answer (D).<\/p>\n

The correct answer is (A).<\/p>\n

Guess what? The technique can also work on some Problem Solving problems. Try it out on the following GMATPrep problem, then join me next week<\/a> to discuss the answer:<\/p>\n

* \u201cFor which of the following functions f<\/em> is f<\/em>(x<\/em>) = f<\/em>(1 \u2013 x<\/em>) for all x<\/em>?<\/p>\n

\u201c(A) f<\/em>(x<\/em>) = 1 \u2013 x<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201c(B) f<\/em>(x<\/em>) = 1 \u2013 x<\/em>2<\/sup><\/p>\n

\u201c(C) f<\/em>(x<\/em>) = x<\/em>2<\/sup> \u2013 (1 \u2013 x<\/em>)2<\/sup><\/p>\n

\u201c(D) f<\/em>(x<\/em>) = x<\/em>2<\/sup>(1 \u2013 x<\/em>)2<\/sup><\/p>\n

\u201c(E)\u00a0\"prob\"<\/p>\n

Key Takeaways: Test Cases on Data Sufficiency<\/h4>\n

(1) When DS asks you a \u201ctheory\u201d question, test cases. Theory questions allow multiple possible scenarios, or cases. Your goal is to see whether the given information provides a consistent answer.<\/p>\n

(2) Specifically, try to disprove the statement: if you can find one Yes and one No answer, then you\u2019re done with that statement. You know it\u2019s insufficient. If you keep trying different kinds of numbers but getting the same answer, see whether you can think through the theory to prove to yourself that the statement really does always work. (If you can\u2019t, but the numbers you try keep giving you one consistent answer, just go ahead and assume that the statement is sufficient. If you\u2019ve made a mistake, you can learn from it later.)<\/p>\n

* GMATPrep\u00ae questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.<\/p>\n

Studying for the GMAT? Take our free GMAT practice exam<\/a> or sign up for a free GMAT trial class<\/a>\u00a0running all the time near you, or online. And, be sure to\u00a0find us on Facebook<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Google+<\/a>,LinkedIn<\/a>, and\u00a0follow us on Twitter<\/a>!<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If you\u2019re going to do a great job on Data Sufficiency, then you\u2019ve got to know how to Test Cases. This strategy will help you on countless DS problems. Try this GMATPrep\u00ae problem from the free exams. Give yourself about 2 minutes. Go! * \u201cOn the number line, if the number k is to the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,8],"tags":[150,319,347,483,52741,623,699,713],"yst_prominent_words":[],"class_list":["post-7996","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-data-suff","category-quant-on-gmat","tag-data-sufficiency","tag-gmat-quant","tag-gmat-strategy","tag-manhattan-gmat","tag-mba-b-school","tag-quant","tag-strategy","tag-study-tips"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7996"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7996\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14036,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7996\/revisions\/14036"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7996"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7996"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=7996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}