{"id":8277,"date":"2015-01-09T17:26:45","date_gmt":"2015-01-09T17:26:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/?p=8277"},"modified":"2019-09-05T16:00:35","modified_gmt":"2019-09-05T16:00:35","slug":"gmat-sentence-correction-find-core-sentence-part-iii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/blog\/gmat-sentence-correction-find-core-sentence-part-iii\/","title":{"rendered":"GMAT Sentence Correction: How To Find the Core Sentence (Part 3)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/1-9-sc-piii.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-8294\" src=\"\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/1-9-sc-piii.png\" alt=\"1-9-SC-PIII\" width=\"375\" height=\"375\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/1-9-sc-piii.png 504w, https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/1-9-sc-piii-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/1-9-sc-piii-300x300.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 375px) 100vw, 375px\" \/><\/a>Welcome to the third installment of our Core Sentence series. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/blog\/2015\/01\/02\/gmat-sentence-correction-find-core-sentence-part-1\/\">part 1<\/a>, we began learning how to strip an SC sentence (or any sentence!) down to the core sentence structure. In<a href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/blog\/2015\/01\/05\/gmat-sentence-correction-find-core-sentence-part-2-2\/\"> part 2<\/a>, we took a look at a compound sentence structure.<\/p>\n<p>Today, we\u2019re going to look at yet another interesting sentence structure that is commonly used on the GMAT.<\/p>\n<p>Try out this GMATPrep\u00ae problem from the free exams. (Note: as in the previous installments, I\u2019m going to discuss aspects of <a href=\"\/\/tinyurl.com\/scprocess\">our SC Process<\/a>; if you haven\u2019t learned it already, read about it before doing this problem.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">* \u201cMany financial experts believe that policy makers at the Federal <span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are<\/span> almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u201c(A) Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u201c(B) Reserve, now viewing the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation and are<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u201c(C) Reserve who, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u201c(D) Reserve, who now view the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation, will be<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u201c(E) Reserve, which now views the economy to be balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, is\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The First Glance didn\u2019t tell me a lot on this one. In each case, there appears to be some kind of modifier going on, signaled either by the who \/ which language or by the comma, but I don\u2019t have a good idea of what\u2019s being tested. Time to read the sentence.<\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t know about you, but the original sentence really doesn\u2019t sound good to me. The difficulty, though, is that I don\u2019t know exactly why. I just find myself thinking, \u201cUgh, I wouldn\u2019t say it that way.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Specifically, I don\u2019t like the \u201cnow viewing\u201d after the comma\u2026but when I examined it a second time, I couldn&#8217;t find an actual error. That\u2019s a good clue to me that I need to leave the answer <em>in<\/em>; they\u2019re just trying to fool my ear (and almost succeeding!).<\/p>\n<p>Because I\u2019m not certain what to examine and because I know that there may be something going on with modifiers, I\u2019m going to strip the original sentence down to the core:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-8289\" src=\"\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/gmat.png\" alt=\"gmat\" width=\"574\" height=\"103\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/gmat.png 574w, https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/gmat-300x53.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 574px) 100vw, 574px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s the core:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Many experts believe that policy makers are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged.<\/p>\n<p>This sentence uses what we call a \u201cSubject-Verb-THAT\u201d structure. When you see the word <em>that<\/em> immediately after a verb, expect another subject and verb (and possibly object) to come after. The full core will be Subject-Verb-THAT-Subject-Verb(-Object).<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-8290\" src=\"\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/gmat1.png\" alt=\"gmat\" width=\"462\" height=\"83\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/gmat1.png 462w, https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/01\/gmat1-300x53.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 462px) 100vw, 462px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Back to the problem: notice where the underline falls. The Subject-Verb-THAT-Subject part is not underlined, but the second verb is, and it\u2019s the last underlined word. Check the core sentence with the different options in the answers:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Many experts believe that policy makers __________ almost certain to leave rates unchanged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">(A) Many experts believe that policy makers are almost certain to leave rates unchanged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">(B) Many experts believe that policy makers and are almost certain to leave rates unchanged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">(C) Many experts believe that policy makers.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">(D) Many experts believe that policy makers will be almost certain to leave rates unchanged.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">(E) Many experts believe that policy makers is almost certain to leave rates unchanged.<\/p>\n<p>Excellent! First, answer (E) is wrong because it uses a singular verb to match with the plural <em>policy makers<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Next, notice that answer (B) tosses the conjunction <em>and<\/em> into the mix. A sentence can have two verbs, in which case you could connect them with an <em>and<\/em>, but this answer just tosses in a random <em>and<\/em> between the subject and the verb. Answer (B) is also incorrect.<\/p>\n<p>Answer (C) is tricky! At first, it might look like the core is the same as answer (A)\u2019s core. It\u2019s not. Notice the lack of a comma before the word <em>who<\/em>. Take a look at this example:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">The cat thought that the dog who lived next door was really annoying.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s the core sentence here? This still has a subject-verb-THAT-subject-verb(-object) set-up. It also has a modifier that contains its own verb\u2014but this verb is not part of the core sentence:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">The cat thought that the dog [<span style=\"text-decoration: line-through\">who lived next door<\/span>] was really annoying.<\/p>\n<p>Answer (C) has this same structure:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">Many experts believe that policy makers [who are almost certain to leave rates unchanged]\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Where\u2019s the main verb that goes with policy makers? It isn\u2019t there at all. Answer (C) is a sentence fragment.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re down to answers (A) and (D). Both cores are solid, so we\u2019ll have to dig a little deeper. So far, we\u2019ve been ignoring the modifier in the middle of the sentence. Let\u2019s take a look; compare the two answers directly:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u201c(A) Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">\u201c(D) Reserve, who now view the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation, will be\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Probably the most obvious difference is <em>are<\/em> vs. <em>will be<\/em>. I don\u2019t like this one though because I think either tense can logically finish the sentence. I\u2019m going to look for something else.<\/p>\n<p>There are two other big differences. First, there\u2019s an idiom. Is it <em>view as<\/em> or <em>view to be<\/em>? If you\u2019re not sure, there\u2019s also a comparison issue. Is the <em>economy balanced between growth and inflation<\/em>? Or <em>between that of growth and inflation<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p>The <em>that of<\/em> structure should be referring to another noun somewhere else: She likes her brother\u2019s house more than she likes that of her sister. In this case, <em>that of<\/em> refers to <em>house<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>What does <em>that of<\/em> refer to in answer (D)?<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m not really sure. The economy? The Federal Reserve? These don\u2019t make sense. The two things that are balanced are, in fact, <em>the growth<\/em> and <em>the inflation<\/em>; <em>that of<\/em> is unnecessary. Answer (D) is incorrect.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The correct answer is (A)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The correct idiom is <em>view as<\/em>, so answers (B), (D), and (E) are all incorrect based on the idiom.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Key Takeaways: Strip the sentence to the Core<\/h3>\n<p>(1) When you see the word <em>that<\/em> immediately following a verb, then you have a Subject-Verb-THAT-Subject-Verb(-Object) structure. Check the core sentence to make sure that all of the necessary pieces are present. Also make sure, as always, that the subjects and verbs match.<\/p>\n<p>(2) If you still have two or more answers left after dealing with the core sentence, then check any modifiers. The two main modifier issues are bad placement (which makes them seem to be pointing to the wrong thing) or meaning issues. In this case, the modifier tossed in a couple of extraneous words that messed up the meaning of the <em>between X and Y<\/em> idiom.<\/p>\n<p>* GMATPrep\u00ae questions courtesy of the Graduate Management Admissions Council. Usage of this question does not imply endorsement by GMAC.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome to the third installment of our Core Sentence series. In part 1, we began learning how to strip an SC sentence (or any sentence!) down to the core sentence structure. In part 2, we took a look at a compound sentence structure. Today, we\u2019re going to look at yet another interesting sentence structure that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,26,10],"tags":[101,233,347,380,393,428,52750,713,772],"yst_prominent_words":[],"class_list":["post-8277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-how-to-study","category-sentence-correction","category-verbal-on-gmat","tag-business-school","tag-gmat","tag-gmat-strategy","tag-gmat-verbal","tag-graduate-management-admissions-test","tag-how-to-study-2","tag-sentence-correction","tag-study-tips","tag-verbal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8277"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8277\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8326,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8277\/revisions\/8326"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8277"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=8277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}