{"id":6405,"date":"2013-10-30T15:43:16","date_gmt":"2013-10-30T19:43:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/blog\/?p=6405"},"modified":"2019-08-30T16:43:17","modified_gmt":"2019-08-30T16:43:17","slug":"analyzing-your-practice-tests-part-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/blog\/analyzing-your-practice-tests-part-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Analyzing Your GRE Practice Tests, Part 3"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 5px; padding: 0; border: 0;\" src=\"\/\/manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2000\/iStock_000018605892XSmall.jpg\" alt=\"gre analysis\" width=\"401\" height=\"243\" align=\"right\" \/><b><i>Did you know that you can attend the first session of any of our online or in-person GMAT courses absolutely free? We\u2019re not kidding!\u00a0<\/i><\/b><a id=\"bloglink\" href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/classes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><b><i>Check out our upcoming courses here<\/i><\/b><\/a><b><i>.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Welcome to part 3 of the article series on analyzing your GRE practice tests. As we discussed in the <a id=\"bloglink\" href=\"\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/blog\/index.php\/2013\/10\/28\/analyzing-your-practice-tests-part-1\/#.UnFeYPmsidk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">first<\/a>\u00a0and <a id=\"bloglink\" href=\"\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/blog\/index.php\/2013\/10\/28\/analyzing-your-practice-tests-part-2\/#.UnFeW_msidk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">second<\/a> parts of this series, we\u2019re basing the discussion on the metrics that are given in Manhattan Prep tests, but you can extrapolate to other tests that give you similar performance data. If you haven\u2019t already read those, do so before you continue with this third part.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In the first part, we discussed how to assess the data provided in the \u201cquestion list\u201d\u2014the list that shows the questions you received and how you performed on each one. In the second part, we began analyzing the data in our Assessment Reports. We\u2019re going to continue with that task today.<\/p>\n<p>Last time, we covered the first of five Assessment Reports that you can generate in the testing system. Today, we\u2019ll cover the final four reports.<\/p>\n<h4>Quantitative by Question Format and Difficulty<\/h4>\n<p>The second report shows your Quant performance by Question Format and Difficulty. You will already have some ideas about your performance from your initial analysis; now, you\u2019re seeing whether this data confirms what you already suspect and whether you can pick up any additional nuance from this more detailed report.<\/p>\n<p>In general, performance drops as questions get harder, so you would expect to have the highest accuracy on the Easier problems, dropping to your lowest accuracy on the Devilish problems. Check to see whether this trend holds or whether the data is surprising.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 5px; padding: 0; border: 0;\" src=\"\/\/manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2013\/10\/stacey-pt-3-1.jpg\" alt=\"gre practice test data 1\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Our pretend student generally followed this expected trend for Quant and QC questions: as the questions got harder, her average performance dropped. (We should really give her a name. Let\u2019s call her\u2026 how about Cathy?) On the other hand, Cathy missed a couple of easier DI questions even though she answered harder DI questions correctly. Hmm! Maybe she made some careless mistakes on something she did know how to do, or maybe the questions tested something that she didn\u2019t know but that she could learn without too much trouble. She\u2019ll need to dig into the individual questions to find out, but it certainly looks like there\u2019s a good opportunity here for her to pick up some points.<\/p>\n<p>Do you see the one data point that really jumps out here? Cathy spent 8.5 minutes on a single DI question! Except for that, her DI timing was right on target. She needs to make sure she\u2019s got a mechanism in place to cut herself off so that she NEVER takes anywhere near that much time on a single question again!<\/p>\n<p>Other than that, this data tells us that what we already hypothesized earlier is likely on target.<\/p>\n<p>(Note: there is also a \u201cmedium-low\u201d difficulty category, but Cathy happened not to get any math questions in that group.)<\/p>\n<h4>Verbal by Question Format and Difficulty<\/h4>\n<p>Now do the same thing for Verbal! (Note: some people prefer to do all of the Quant analysis and then do all of the Verbal analysis; feel free to do the analysis in whatever order makes the most sense to you.)<\/p>\n<p>The third report is identical to the second, except it shows your Verbal performance instead of Quant.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 5px; padding: 0; border: 0;\" src=\"\/\/manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2013\/10\/stacey-pt-3-2.jpg\" alt=\"gre practice test data verbal\" \/><\/p>\n<p>As expected, Cathy\u2019s performance generally drops as the questions get harder. There is one exception though: she answered 75% of devilish Sentence Equivalence questions correctly but only 33% of the medium-high questions. She was also working WAY too quickly\u2014she spent less than 30 seconds per medium-high question, on average! She\u2019ll need to check the individual questions to make sure, but she may have made careless mistakes due to working too quickly. She needs to slow down a bit!<\/p>\n<p>Alternatively, perhaps she knew she didn\u2019t know some vocab words. She needs to make flashcards for them right now and start studying!<\/p>\n<p>Note: the timing averages for Reading Comprehension vary a great deal because the first question for each long passage includes the time to read the passage itself. For Reading Comp, you may need to dive back into the problem list to look at each problem individually in order to get a true picture of what happened.<\/p>\n<p>As with the Quant, this data reinforces what we hypothesized when looking at the first report.<\/p>\n<h4>Quantitative by Content Area &#038; Topic<\/h4>\n<p>The fourth report shows your Quant performance by the specific content area covered. The report contains 5 sub-reports, one for each Quant content area, corresponding to the Manhattan Prep GRE Quant <a id=\"bloglink\" href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/store\/strategy-guides\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Strategy Guides<\/a> (Algebra, Fractions Decimals &#038; Percents, Geometry, Number Properties, and Word Problems). I\u2019ll show you just one of these (Fractions, Decimals, &#038; Percents) for our fictional student, Cathy; all five sub-reports work in the same way.\u00a0 To see the others, you would click on the underlined Text at the top of the page (Algebra, Geometry, etc.).<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 5px; padding: 0; border: 0;\" src=\"\/\/manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2013\/10\/stacey-pt-3-3.jpg\" alt=\"gre practice test data verbal\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Take a crack at it yourself first. What do you think this data tells you?<\/p>\n<p>The initial report indicated that Cathy generally performs well on these topics but sometimes takes too much time. When we dig into the details, we can see that there\u2019s quite a performance split depending on topic area.<\/p>\n<p>She\u2019s fast with Fractions and with Digits &#038; Decimals. In fact, maybe she\u2019s too fast and her speed cost her the three incorrect questions in this area. She should check the three problems to be sure.<\/p>\n<p>See how the word <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Fractions<\/span> is underlined in the report? It\u2019s actually a link. Click on it and another window will pop up with the three problems that fall into this category. Cathy can go and review them immediately!<\/p>\n<p>What else? Cathy\u2019s too slow with FDP Connections problems (these problems combine aspects of Fractions, Decimals, and Percents). She answered 5 out of 6 correctly, but some were slow enough that her overall average for that group was almost 3 minutes. She\u2019s going to need to figure out how to do the work a bit more efficiently. (As before, she can click on the <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">FDP Connections<\/span> link to view those problems immediately.)<\/p>\n<p>Finally, she took more than 3 minutes to answer one of the Percents problems incorrectly. If she\u2019s going to get it wrong anyway, she wants to get it wrong faster next time. She\u2019ll need to examine the problem to figure out what clues should signal to her next time that this problem is just too hard and she should let go much faster.<\/p>\n<p>I need to give you one major caveat here. You\u2019ll notice that a lot of these categories contain only 1 or 2 questions. A \u201c0% right\u201d label, that doesn\u2019t necessarily mean you\u2019re terrible at this topic. For example, perhaps the 1 or 2 questions were harder questions. For this reason, you might also run the assessment reports using your last <i>two or three<\/i> exams so that the fourth and fifth reports contain more questions.<\/p>\n<p>At this stage, your goal is really to dive into the problems and figure out <i>why<\/i> things played out they way that they did. If you discover that you answered something incorrectly and quickly because you knew that you didn\u2019t know how to do it, that\u2019s a great reason to get something wrong fast. In that case, you did exactly what you should have done.<\/p>\n<h4>Verbal by Type &#038; Topic<\/h4>\n<p>The fifth report shows your Verbal performance by question type. The report covers only Reading Comprehension questions because only RC has different question types. The data for the other two question types, Sentence Completion and Text Equivalence, is the same data you saw in the first report, the Assessment Summary.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s Cathy\u2019s report:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 5px; padding: 0; border: 0;\" src=\"\/\/manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/19\/2013\/10\/stacey-pt-3-4.jpg\" alt=\"gre practice tests 4\" \/><\/p>\n<p>What do you think? Remember that the average timing here may or may not be indicative of a problem, because the first question of a long passage includes the time to read the passage.<\/p>\n<p>Cathy\u2019s good at RC in general. Relatively speaking, her lowest area is Strengthen\/Weaken\u2014but she still answered 50% of the problems correctly. This category typically reflects short passage questions, so Cathy\u2019s moving much faster than she should on these. Perhaps her lower relative performance is due to careless mistakes caused by speed. She\u2019ll need to examine the individual questions to see.<\/p>\n<p>Join us for the<a id=\"bloglink\" href=\"\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/blog\/index.php\/2013\/10\/30\/analyzing-your-practice-tests-part-4\/#.UnFkXPmsidk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> fourth and final part of this series<\/a>, where we\u2019ll summarize all of this information so that you can start to tackle your weaknesses!<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<div>\n<p><em><strong>Can\u2019t get enough of Stacey\u2019s GMAT mastery? Attend the first session of one of\u00a0<a id=\"bloglink\" href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/classes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">her upcoming GMAT courses<\/a>\u00a0absolutely free, no strings attached. Seriously.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a id=\"bloglink\" href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/instructors\/stacey-koprince\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-9719 size-thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn2.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/2015\/06\/stacey-koprince-150x150.png\" alt=\"stacey-koprince\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a><em><strong><a id=\"bloglink\" href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/instructors\/stacey-koprince\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Stacey Koprince<\/a>\u00a0is a Manhattan Prep instructor based in Montreal, Canada and Los Angeles, California.<\/strong>\u00a0Stacey has been teaching the GMAT, GRE, and LSAT \u00a0for more than 15 years and is one of the most well-known instructors in the industry. Stacey loves to teach and is absolutely fascinated by standardized tests.\u00a0<a id=\"bloglink\" href=\"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gmat\/classes\/#instructor\/86\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Check out Stacey\u2019s upcoming GMAT courses here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Did you know that you can attend the first session of any of our online or in-person GMAT courses absolutely free? We\u2019re not kidding!\u00a0Check out our upcoming courses here. Welcome to part 3 of the article series on analyzing your GRE practice tests. As we discussed in the first\u00a0and second parts of this series, we\u2019re [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[474284,921840,421,6,7,733451,9,733445],"tags":[1362411,265],"yst_prominent_words":[],"class_list":["post-6405","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-current-studiers","category-gre-prep-2","category-gre-quant-2","category-gre-strategies","category-how-to-study","category-life-hacks","category-math-gre-strategies","category-study-tips-2","tag-gre-practice-tests","tag-practice-tests"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6405","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6405"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6405\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10701,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6405\/revisions\/10701"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6405"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6405"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6405"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.manhattanprep.com\/gre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=6405"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}