by tommywallach Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:00 pm
Hey Nadir,
Unfortunately there's no other way to do it. Just testing numbers randomly wouldn't help.
Basically, they're saying that a certain number x is one less than the reciprocal of whatever part of x comes after the decimal.
As an example.
1.2
The part after the decimal = .2
The reciprocal = 1/.2 = 5
Is 5 equal to 1.2 + 1? Nope. So that isn't our x.
Finding the x at random is impossible, but we can use the classic technique of plugging in the value from the other column. This works, and is clearly our x value.
You can ignore the rest of the explanation, which is just trying to prove it more fundamentally/algebraically. Who cares? We've proven it with the number itself, and that's enough.
-t