by tommywallach Fri Nov 28, 2014 9:00 pm
Hey Dan,
I see what you're mistaking. You think the sentence:
The value of 30 oobers equals the value of 12 darbles
MEANS
The ratio of Oobers to darbles is 30 to 12
Unfortunately, they are not the same thing. Keep in mind that the original sentence says nothing about ratios, so you're jumping to a conclusion there. If it helps, think of it this way, if the value of 30 oobers equals the value of 12 darbles, which is worth more, darbles or oobers? Clearly, darbles are worth more (because you only need 12 of them to equal 30 oobers). This means that the ratio of Oobers to Darbles should favor Darbles, because they are worth more.
If that doesn't help, all you really need to know is that ratios have to be expressed with division. This is why the book jumps immediately to division. The ratio of Oobers to Darbles must be expressed as O/D. So we should solve our original equation to have O/D on one side, as that represents the ratio of Oobers to Darbles.
Hope that makes it clearer!
-t