PT49, S4, Q15 Factory Safety Act

[sethgrant]

I understand the logic

If operate auto factory ---> Registered B
If Registered B ---> must have punctual inspections

thus

operate auto factory --> must have punctual inspection

I don't understand the wording in answer A). that says "entail the unacceptability of a certain state of affairs..."

Is there a way you can clear this up for me?

[noah]

Yeah, that is a bit strange how it's worded. First off, none of the other answers make sense:

(B) is wrong because there aren't two possible interpretations.
(C) is unsupported; there's no discussion of incompatibility.
(D) is unsupported; there's no conflict.
(E) is out of scope; there's no analogy!

So, even with (A) not making sense, it must be correct because the others are dreadfully wrong.

the unacceptable state of affairs is found to the last sentence is which the argument says that a "factory would not be able to postpone..." You seem to get the jointly entails part.

Does that make sense?