Explanation check please! Particularly the conditional logic. Correct answer: (A) TASK: "Must also be true" = Inference question. NOT in the Assumption Family, don't hunt a conclusion. Attack the stimulus: - small, experimental vacuum tubes work under heat conditions that are too intense f...

An idea:

S's conclusion is an analogy.
The evidence in an analogy is that two things CAN be compared.
T attacks S’s analogy by saying the two parts of the analogy (fighting, voting) can’t be compared.
So we can say that T attacks S's ev.

Thoughts? Correct or off base?