hi, sorry to bring the old thread up, but i chose B on this one i really think i nailed the test maker's tricks . :? but i reckon the 'negation' means the causation ,which means he falsily take the negation as a sign of causation, since in a lot of examples we see the correlation of ~A----~B A------...

this is about the most time-consuming inference question ive ever had. :shock: .so let me go throught the answer choices again: A firstly emotionally affected is unsupported in the passage, or if we can assume being emotionally affected relate to giving things adequete attention, then the choice is ...

i'm confused because of the word 'enable',i remembered in a previous test enable do imply a necessary condition and i specifically make notes about it...so thats why i was pissed when i found the right answer... 1.IMHO permits, enable,is consistent with.these kinds of words are definetely not suffic...

Hi tommy i think the beverage part is a little bit tooo detail creep for NO.5 i think its because the comparison is btw decaffeinated coffee drinker and people who dont ..it should be compare with peoplewho drink regular coffee...thats how i cope with during timed prep.. am i justified in doing that...

i got the question right under time pressure but when i was reviewing it i stuck btw D & E. D:negate this would makes it possible that the chemical company we are talking about accounts for just a normal share of the pollutant while the other monster four take the majority, then of course the co...

Hi Atlas i know the conditional structure goes like: premise:A<--some->B---->C conclusion: A<--some--->C but i dont understand why D is not analogous tp the structure. i dont think its because the all lake is teeming with healthy fish .if all the fish in the lake is healthy then appar...