We are tasked with finding 4 answers that explain the decrease in total fish count and 1 answer that does not explain the decrease. I seek help in correcting my original thought process when deciding between options C and D. While C proposes an increase in anglers, D proposes a decrease in anglers. ...

A late reply to a question, but hopefully this will help others who look upon this thread... You cannot assume anything about the size of the crack given that no adjectives are used with crack. Even if the crack were relatively 'small', a 'small' crack on an extremely large comet would be emitting a...

I’m seeking to further convince myself of why (D) is wrong. Any help? I selected (B) and understand that this is indeed a necessary assumption of the argument. I also understand that (D) seems too strong of wording with ‘never’ for a necessary assumption question. But… I still think the negation of ...

So simple! Thank you. Now to focus on not overlooking ANY of the words in the stimulus...!

I have actually been searching for explanations of "sufficient and necessary causes" and came across this thread. Thank you ohpatrick for explaining the difference. I want to re-affirm that PR DOES use "the only" when referring to basic causality. And actually, shaynfernandez was...

Scornful was too strong of an answer choice. RC answer choices tend to stay away from 'extreme' choices & stick to broader, safer correct answers. Also, think about it this way--- would the test makers want all of the future, would-be lawyers reading a passage that is "scornful" of law...