Search found 5 matches

Return to advanced search

by pacificbonito
Fri Aug 07, 2015 3:52 pm
 
Forum: Section #1
Topic: Q5 - Oscar: I have been accused
Replies: 10
Views: 2963
Jump to post

Re: Q5 - Oscar: I have been accused

Please Help! I thought the questions (5-6) were fairly easy, although I got both of them wrong answering 5.)A and 6.)D... The misunderstanding doesn't seem to involve any contrapositives, I would have chosen answer D for question 5 but for the specific language - '_relinquishes_ his or her _exclusiv...
by pacificbonito
Wed Aug 12, 2015 8:30 pm
 
Forum: Section #4
Topic: Q7 - DataCom, a company that filed
Replies: 6
Views: 2225
Jump to post

Re: Q7 - DataCom, a company that filed

Revisited. Sorry if this has been adequately explained elsewhere or already here and I just didn't understand. I was hoping if someone could give a better analysis of answer a. (I'll try and break down my idea of what it means) : PRESUPPOSES [what is sets out to demonstrate about the] (a) relationsh...
by pacificbonito
Wed Aug 12, 2015 10:07 pm
 
Forum: Section #4
Topic: Q13 - Police published a "wanted" poster
Replies: 14
Views: 3995
Jump to post

Re: Q13 - Police published a "wanted" poster

This will be my last post regarding prep test 12. I am apparently VERY bad at the logical reasoning section. But what's wrong with B.)??? I understand the 'constraints' of conforming to the gunshot would and infectious disease rules (and I did overlook them, sort of), but the question stem does not ...
by pacificbonito
Thu Aug 27, 2015 6:36 pm
 
Forum: Section #2
Topic: Q22 - Director of personnel
Replies: 12
Views: 3615
Jump to post

Re: Q22 - Director of personnel

Hi. Sorry if this sounds nit-picky, but I get upset when I get a question wrong and don't fully understand or agree with the reasoning, so I was hoping some of you LSAT insiders might help me to understand. I don't see how the issue is not being sidestepped, even though it was acknowledged. I grant ...
by pacificbonito
Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:50 pm
 
Forum: Section #1
Topic: Q19 - Educator: It has been argued
Replies: 12
Views: 8223
Jump to post

Re: Q19 - Educator: It has been argued

I'm not really getting it, but really want to know is this: Do you (LSAT experts, not students please!) feel that this is a rather crummy and deceptive question? I do not see how the first sentence says anything much at all - 'it has been argued..." There's nothing to say it is a good argument,...