Here is how I preclude (A) It is a principal support question. This type of questions often has conclusions that dictate how one should or shouldn't act or behave. (A) is not a principal. It doesn't show what should writers do. Only (D) looks like a principal since it has "a writing style shoul...

How come the reasoning is Conditional Logic?

I eliminated A for the same reason. Please help!

Is Cambridge RC by type PT1-PT38 still good as practice material? Are the articles/questions still similar as the ones in recent years? Thanks!

Hi,

Looking for a study partner in New York to prepare for December lsat. Current level is 165-170. Please reach me at Jiangziou@gmail.com. Thanks!

It took me a long time to understand this Mistaken Negation question.. The conditionality is as follows. People making economic decisions cannot readily compare environmental factors. Solving this problem requires assigning monetary values to environmental factors.(compare--->$) But $ values resu...

Society should bestow people the privilege of adulthood once they are mature.

When are they mature?

Mature 1: they are ready to accept the corresponding responsibilities.
Mature 2: their physiological development is completed.

I try to use a math equation to explain this flaw. Pt 5- S1-Q11 is the same flaw type as this one: 5% non-cocaine users will test positive, and 99% cocaine users will test positive, so the vast majority of people who test positive have used cocaine. For both questions, if we want to know the accurac...

I think it would be relevant if the Stationary supplier is talking about the history of recycled paper or how to make recycled paper.
Instead he is talking about the history of the finest paper, which is totally irrelevant.

Here are my thoughts. Hope it helps. This question is no more unique than others in terms of the approach of "Identify the disagreement" questions. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=d210d1d873&view=fimg&th=1569ffa191d9e927&attid=0.1&disp=emb&...

I am not sure about (B), because top graduates of business school may also be unskilled.

I understand "unskilled" as "no experience on the work". A top graduate of business school is not equal to work experience.

Could someone please explain A: Disregard the possibility that a change of mind might be justified by a change in circumstances?

I interpret it as: Hana's brother change their mind and decide not to give her the recording gift because they are not invited to the party.

I think you can rule out (C) without knowing ANYTHING about physics. Logician has mastered the laws of logic --> Arguing that logician broke the laws of logic is like arguing that a physicist broke the laws of physics (which, according to (C) is possible) Even if it is possible though, what does...

I think (A) does not imply another possible reason. It is furnishing the author's first reason--"the information's being delivered too quickly" weiyichen1986 has a very good point. "Analysis of the info content of a typical broadcast news story shows...." The argument is talking ...

When it says that the regions "contain only minor faults,", it means such regions contain at least one fault. No conditionality. It's like those glasses contain only water". It means they have water in it. The first sentence states that nuclear reactors built in geologically quiet reg...

Is "So by using BTI....you can greatly reduce..without diminishing" a conditional statement?

I know "without" can introduce necessary conditions, for example:

Humans cannot survive without water.
Survive--->Water

This is Necessary Assumption Let's keep it simple. Question type: Sufficient Assumption. If Bevex consumed in large quantities ---> unsafe. Human consumes 25 cans per day (a large quantity) ----> unsafe. The conclusion is that it is safe. In order for this to be true it must be true that human...

Here are my thoughts. For assumption questions, right answers should either close the gap between the premise and the conclusion or eliminate an alternate explanation. Typical wrong answers are premise boosters, conclusion redundancy, opposites, out of scope and reversed logic. Answer (A) is right, ...

(B) states that Farming practices introduced for the sake of maximizing profits can improve the living conditions of farm animals.

I think "can improve" is different with "improve". The latter cannot be generalized.

In this question, cows can be generalized to farm animals.

I think there might be a very simple way to look at this question. Entrepreneurs = start a business The reasoning of the questions is : Entrepreneurs --> more overconfident, ===conclusion===> more overconfident --> Entrepreneurs (start a business) This is a mistaken reverse. "More over...