I too have an issue with this question, the stimulus specifically states that only a certain amount of restaurants have sale figures that allow for a comparison between last year and the year before.... how can one infer that there were at least one new restaurant opened in the last two years, if th...

I for the life of me just cannot understand why C is correct, could someone explain it? I really can't even understand how its the best choice for the stimulus? This one definitely went way over my head!

I believe that the answers are definitely all crappy. I disagree with D because it seems like to much of a definitive statement... In the stimulus it says "(not word for word) in a small initial trial, the system NEVER incorrectly accepted someone seeking access to the computer's data thus, thi...

Man... I agree, if I took this logical reasoning section I would have flipped. A lot of the answer choices in this test just seem highly questionable I'm having a hard time seeing how C would be incorrect? If in the stimulus it says that the at the press conference, the oil company admitted that oil...

I agree... I do not see how these two scientists are disagreeing over the relative significance of various aspects of the evidence... each of their evidences are compatible with one another. Dr tyson states: they are clearly hominid footprints, since they show human characteristics: square heel, and...

too be honest, I didn't pick A because it just stated "high ranking alumni"

High ranking in what? athletics?

Are we suppose to assume they meant academically high ranking?

Sometimes i look way to deeply into the language...

I originally chose B, but I am seeing why E is correct now. With B, Giselle is not necessarily ADVANCING an analogous position, to show a weakness in joel's position, instead she's is calling into a question a part of joel's definition of the myth, what part exactly? The part that joel says, "m...

I thought about this for a long time, and this is the reasoning I came up with. Since this is an assumption family question, I thought I need to find a missing connection. Conclusion is about telling how quickly an "idea" holds, but the premise focusses only on " words." So prob...

same here, I eliminated A and reluctantly chose B because I thought A was stating what we already knew. I am usually very wary on answers choices like these on the LSAT, because they have been wrong in the past, seeing as it seems as though it is a premise booster! Can anyone help me to figure out w...

I have a question and would really love if someone could let me know For (E) could we say that this answer choice is a part to whole flaw aswell? Just because SOME (part) students did do well without the program, this would not show how the the program (as a whole) was not successful?? similarly wit...