Search found 6 matches

Return to advanced search

by KelliW299
Wed Sep 13, 2017 8:57 pm
 
Forum: Section #4
Topic: Q4 - Ecologist: Before finding a mate
Replies: 8
Views: 317
Jump to post

Re: Q4 - Ecologist: Before finding a mate

Question about the stem - when it asks us to strengthen the support - isn't that asking us to strengthen the evidence (premises)?

Thanks!
by KelliW299
Wed Jun 27, 2018 7:03 pm
 
Forum: Section #3
Topic: Q13 - Astronomers have found new evidence
Replies: 6
Views: 2380
Jump to post

Re: Q13 - Astronomers have found new evidence

Please explain answer choice C more. If the instruments are better it allows us to see more galaxies. So those galaxies were already there we just SEE them now. So the same weight/mass was unaffected because they were already there we just couldn’t see them yet. Please clarify.
by KelliW299
Fri Jul 13, 2018 11:37 pm
 
Forum: Section #4
Topic: Q14 - Principle: A government should reduce taxes
Replies: 2
Views: 280
Jump to post

Re: Q14 - Principle: A government should reduce taxes

Can’t you contropose P1 to line up with (A)?
by KelliW299
Mon Jul 16, 2018 9:03 pm
 
Forum: Passage #3 - Judicial Reasoning
Topic: Q21
Replies: 3
Views: 352
Jump to post

Re: Q21

Can you address choice E please - thanks.
by KelliW299
Mon Jul 16, 2018 9:28 pm
 
Forum: Passage #1 - Forest Preservation
Topic: Q7
Replies: 3
Views: 458
Jump to post

Re: Q7

Can a teacher chime in on this one please
by KelliW299
Fri Jul 20, 2018 6:02 pm
 
Forum: Section #1
Topic: Q21 - Ethicist: It is morally right to reveal
Replies: 2
Views: 533
Jump to post

Re: Q21 - Ethicist: It is morally right to reveal

The first conditional statement is MR—>…. Why’s is written in the contrapostive in the explanation but the second conditional statement isn’t?