r1r200
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 9
Joined: October 14th, 2009
 
 
 

PT 58, S2, Q24 - The Kiffer Forest Preserve, in the...

by r1r200 Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:29 pm

Question #24 really stumped me. Thanks for any help on this.
 
dan
Thanks Received: 155
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 202
Joined: March 10th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: PT 58, S2, Q2 - The Kiffer Forest Preserve, in the

by dan Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:01 pm

We have this basic argument core:

road closed, preserve's population nearly doubled -----> thus, keep road closed, entire valley's population will increase

Notice that the supporting premise is in regard to the preserve's population, whereas the conclusion is in regard to the entire valley's population. This would be a flawed argument if we knew that the rest of the valley (the area outside the preserve) could experience a BIG drop in population in the years to come (to counteract the potentially big increase inside the preserve). Answer choice (E) indicates that this is a possibility, because this is what happened over the past eight years (if the total valley population stayed roughly constant, and the area inside the preserve experienced a near doubling of population, then the area outside the preserve must have experienced a significant drop in population).

Answer (D) is close (it weakens, but not as much as (E)). Any old "decrease" in population outside the preserve might not be enough to counter the big increase within the preserve.

Hope that helps!

dan