todavidzheng
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 12
Joined: January 09th, 2011
 
 
 

PT55, S1, Q6 Mathematics teacher:...

by todavidzheng Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:57 pm

Could anyone please go over #6? I am unclear how choice(A) is selected.

Thanks a lot!
User avatar
 
bbirdwell
Thanks Received: 864
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 803
Joined: April 16th, 2009
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: PT55, S1, Q6 Mathematics teacher:...

by bbirdwell Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:12 pm

First, dissect the argument. Find the core of the argument and consider any noticeable gaps in the logic. Our correct answer will likely be a general rule that bridges that specific gap.

Conclusion:
If we're gonna teach them calculus, we should make sure they can handle abstraction.

Why?
1. if we teach them calculus before they're ready, they'll abandon math.

Think about that for a second? What assumptions might the author be making?

The one that sticks out the most to me is this: why should we avoid teaching it to them just because they might abandon math? Apparently, the author believes this abandonment to be a bad thing.

(A) says this, in a kind of awkward way. IF it's true that only we should only teach something to those who are ready for a it and won't lose motivation (abandon it), then the argument above makes sense.
I host free online workshop/Q&A sessions called Zen and the Art of LSAT. You can find upcoming dates here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/zen-and-the-art.cfm