by bbirdwell Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:12 pm
First, dissect the argument. Find the core of the argument and consider any noticeable gaps in the logic. Our correct answer will likely be a general rule that bridges that specific gap.
Conclusion:
If we're gonna teach them calculus, we should make sure they can handle abstraction.
Why?
1. if we teach them calculus before they're ready, they'll abandon math.
Think about that for a second? What assumptions might the author be making?
The one that sticks out the most to me is this: why should we avoid teaching it to them just because they might abandon math? Apparently, the author believes this abandonment to be a bad thing.
(A) says this, in a kind of awkward way. IF it's true that only we should only teach something to those who are ready for a it and won't lose motivation (abandon it), then the argument above makes sense.