Hi,
So I did choose (D) but upon review I have some questions. Is (D) really a necessary assumption? Let's negate it. Theater managers do not generally believe that a film that is attractive to younger audiences is more likely to be profitable than other films. So what? It doesn't destroy the argument to me. The conclusion isn't based on a comparison or on an idea of maximizing profits - it's about getting theater managers to rent films that they think will generate enough total revenue to yield a profit. That's all...the film does not need to be more likely to be profitable than any others - it just needs to yield a profit. So how is (D) necessary, then? OR does it have to do with film producers "wanting their films to be shown as widely as possible" and thereby needing to maximize the appeal of their films - thereby requiring an answer choice showing that younger audiences are comparatively more appealing to theater managers than other films??
Also, what's off with (E)? Let's negate it. Films that have an appeal to older audiences sometimes do generate a profit for theaters that show them. I suppose the argument could still go on...so what if the older-targeted films sometimes generate a profit, it's still possible that there is something special and more attractive about films that cater to younger audiences than those that cater to the older audience that will more likely lead a film on the path of being shown more widely. Is this reasoning correct?
thanks!
