I chose correct answer (E) because other choices were not good enough.
Why grandson's desire matters, though?
Is it because he is a beneficiary?
jardinsouslapluie5 Wrote:I chose correct answer (E) because other choices were not good enough.
Why grandson's desire matters, though?
Is it because he is a beneficiary?
nflamel69 Wrote:I have a question regarding A and E. While E does strengthen the fact that there are reasons to sell the house, but does it necessarily strengthen the fact that Loux will unlikely to have any objections?
skbok09 Wrote:Why would D be irrelevant?
I eliminated A,B,C easily and got stuck with D/E and chose D.
If the Stoke Farm was the main cause of the debt, paying debt by selling it would be ridiculous. For example, if you buy a car or house and accumulate debt, selling that property to pay debt would destroy the original purpose of purchasing it. That is the analogy I used to justify D over E.
I thought E was irrelevant because what the beneficiary would think is irrelevant as opposed to what Loux would think.
Can someone explain why D is irrelevant?
ixxiwang Wrote:nflamel69 Wrote:I have a question regarding A and E. While E does strengthen the fact that there are reasons to sell the house, but does it necessarily strengthen the fact that Loux will unlikely to have any objections?
You may A?
Loux will unlikely object because selling the farm (specifically) would be something Zembaty would be legally required to do and if he doesn't want to he can just rent porsche dubai car and forget about selling somthing to buy something, i.e. Zembarty has to clear the estate's debt and cannot do so without selling the farm - there is no other way. If Zembarty cannot do this, then Loux can forget about 'distributing the remainder to the beneficiary' at all.