I felt the answer choice (C) is a big jump to connect studied group and smokers. They said, "these people TEND to" which we have to think those people are smokers...
Big assumption, no?
But, if it has more possibility than other answer choices, it's okay?

Why does not (A) strengthen the argument?

The correct answer(E) says "explicitly" and I thought Galen, Pliny and other ancient writers quote opinions of male and female doctors "indiscriminately" so how can they be "explicit"? I interpreted as they don't discriminate so they don't explicitly refer opinions of e...

Why is (C) wrong?

Why is (E) wrong?

I don't understand this answer (C).
I think it's the grammatical issue for me to understand.

Conclusion: we don't need gloves to keep our hands warm

Because: putting an extra layer of clothing on our vital organ(body???) can keep our hands warm

Okay....

I still don't understand (C).

I don't know why, but I cannot use (B) to strengthen the argument.
Could anybody explain?

Could you explain the difference between (C) and (D)?
Is conclusion the key?

I don't understand the wrong answers explanation.

Just saying "nothing to do with uphill" does not show how it has nothing to do with.
I need more detailed explanation for wrong answers please.

I don't understand the stimulus.
Could anybody help explaining this?
Thank you.

Is (C) wrong because it does not mention Byron?

Also, I cannot completely understand why (B) is right.
Why is "recurring"?

Thank you in advance.

Wrong answers are obvious, but I don't understand the grammer on correct answer (C).

I don't understand the first part of the sentences, "Across~filled"

Could anybody explain, please?

I chose correct answer (B).
But, it just because other choices were not good enough.
Could you explain why (B) is correct?
Thank you.

I understand why (D) is correct.
But, why not (E)?
Job-related stress could be the real cause for the headache, and not the VDT...

I chose correct answer (E) because other choices were not good enough.

Why grandson's desire matters, though?
Is it because he is a beneficiary?

In correct answer (D), am I supposed to assume those aspects are "not mentioned in a judge's opinion" because they discuss variables?
Or do I miss the phrase where says "judge's opinion"...

Why not (E)?
And what is the difference between "analogy" and "example(instance)"?

Why not (B)?

Could you explain the differences between (B), (C) and correct answer (D)?

I was almost get to (D), but then I saw "if" and hesitated to mark as correct answer choice.

Thanks.

are you saying that they could have died during the summer and that these researchers are flawed in that they didn't take into account the fact that they could have died during summer for other reasons than them dying during winter of cold? Sounds like you got it. It seems to me there are lots of a...